Customer #0 disclosure. Primal Mountain Medical is owned and operated by Authoritize's founder. PMM was the design partner during platform development. We disclose this rather than hide it. Every number on this page is real, pulled from PMM's live production stack.

Case Study · Hormone Replacement & Peptide Therapy · Mountain West
Primal Mountain MedicalCustomer #0 · Physician-led hormone optimization, Mountain West
Primal Mountain Medical, a physician-led hormone replacement and peptide therapy practice in the Mountain West, built its growth on paid ads until Meta and Google's 2025 health and wellness policy changes broke that playbook overnight. Authoritize replaced the marketing site and rebuilt the content engine. In the first 90 days (March 22 to June 22, 2026), PMM booked 252 new appointments from organic search, grew its Google keyword footprint about 64% over the prior 90 days, and became a cited source across all five major AI engines. The data shows what happens when paid acquisition gets traded for an owned, compounding content asset.
Primal Mountain Medical · 90-day results · March 22 to June 22, 2026
Every number here is verified from PMM's live production analytics, not a hand-built slide. Authoritize clients get their own live dashboard wired to the same sources.
CRO
252
Appointments booked
Day 0 → first 90 days
Booked from organic search, not paid ads. The owned channel compounding.
CRO
57%
Organic intent → booked
new domain → 57% convert
Booking intent to booked appointment, a clean GA4 window.
SEO
+64%
Keyword footprint
1,005 kw → 1,653 kw
Distinct keywords earning Google impressions, the 90 days after the rebuild vs the 90 before.
SEO
#1
Google rank, non-brand terms
unranked → position 1
"low t clinic," "men's health clinic," "hormone optimization near me." Top-5 for "testosterone therapy."
GEO
5 / 5
AI engines citing PMM
ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, Perplexity, and Claude, with no AI presence 90 days ago.
GEO
75%
ChatGPT referral conversion
In a single week, ChatGPT referred 8 new visitors and 6 of them converted.
SEO, search engine optimization · GEO, generative engine optimization (AI search) · CRO, conversion rate optimization
By the numbers · 90 days
Appointments booked
Organic intent → booked
Keywords w/ impressions
Non-brand Google rank
AI engines citing PMM
ChatGPT referral conversion
Lighthouse performance
Lighthouse SEO
AI search visibility · 90 days
- Cited across all 5 major AI engines: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude.
- 45 AI citations. The #1-cited source on 11 distinct questions, top-cited in 84%.
- The #1 answer to "is PMM legit?" and "are there real doctors?" on every major engine.
- Cited for non-brand buyer questions like the best TRT clinic in Utah.
- PMM's own content cited alongside NIH, FDA, and PubMed.
- In a single week, ChatGPT referred 8 new visitors and 6 converted (75%).
Customer #0 disclosure
Primal Mountain Medical is owned and operated by Jason Skeesick, also the sole founder of Authoritize. PMM was the design partner during platform development, which is why the data is this granular: every metric here comes from the same production stack our other clients deploy. We disclose this rather than hide it.
Data sources
- Google Search Console, rankings & impressions
- Google Analytics 4, traffic & sessions
- Cloudflare RUM, real-user load time
- Microsoft Clarity, conversion events
- Google Lighthouse, performance scores
- Neon PostgreSQL, daily snapshot database
Results are from a single client engagement over 90 days. Individual results will vary based on starting site condition, market, sub-vertical, and competitive landscape.
Common questions about this case study
What results did Primal Mountain Medical see in 90 days with Authoritize?
In its first 90 days (March 22 to June 22, 2026), PMM booked 252 new appointments from organic search, and organic visitors converted from booking intent to a booked appointment at 57%. Its Google keyword footprint grew about 64% versus the prior 90 days (from roughly 1,005 to 1,653 distinct keywords earning impressions), with non-branded terms like "low t clinic" and "hormone optimization near me" at position 1. PMM also became a cited source across all five major AI engines (ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude), the #1-cited source on 11 distinct questions, on a site scoring 97 performance and 97 SEO in Google Lighthouse.
Is Primal Mountain Medical cited by AI search engines like ChatGPT?
Yes. In its first 90 days, PMM had no AI-search presence and became cited across all five major AI engines: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Gemini, Perplexity, and Claude. Across 45 AI citations it holds the top-cited position in 38 of them and is the #1-cited source on 11 distinct questions. When someone asks an AI assistant whether PMM is legitimate or whether real doctors are behind it, PMM is the #1 answer on every major engine, and it is also cited for non-branded buyer questions like the best TRT clinic in Utah. AI engines place PMM's own content alongside NIH, FDA, and PubMed as a trusted source. AI search is already converting: in a single week, ChatGPT referred 8 new visitors and 6 of them became patients, a 75% conversion rate.
Why is Primal Mountain Medical labeled Customer #0?
Primal Mountain Medical is owned and operated by Authoritize's founder, Jason Skeesick. PMM was the design partner during Authoritize platform development and the first practice to deploy the full stack in production. The relationship is disclosed in a banner and sidebar on this page because the production data is the most rigorous proof of what the platform does.
Why did paid ads stop working for Primal Mountain Medical in 2025?
Both Meta and Google rewrote the rules for health and wellness advertisers in 2025. Meta's Andromeda update replaced granular targeting with a black-box optimization system, and health verticals lost more signal than any other category. Previously profitable campaigns nosedived. Server-side attribution rebuilds didn't restore performance because the ad platforms were routing the budget to a measurably lower-quality lead pool.
Why does Authoritize track popular health podcasts?
Major health podcasts like Huberman Lab, Peter Attia's Drive, and Rich Roll create huge spikes in search demand the moment an episode drops. Within hours, millions of listeners are Googling phrases from the episode. Authoritize monitors these high-velocity content sources so clients can publish a fully-researched, physician-vetted, citation-backed article the same day, while patient demand is at its peak. Real, clickable PubMed citations are included so a skeptical reader can verify each claim. The result: patients searching for what they just heard about find the client's clinic at the top of the answer, not a competitor's. This turnaround speed is not matched by traditional agencies, in-house medical-content teams, or general-purpose AI tools.
Why does Authoritize require physician review on every article?
Two reasons. First, Google's E-E-A-T (experience, expertise, authoritativeness, trustworthiness) signals reward content with verifiable medical expertise behind it, especially in YMYL (Your Money, Your Life) categories like health. A licensed physician reviewing, revising, and signing every article moves the content into the tier Google's helpful-content systems prioritize. Second, every published claim is the client clinic's medical statement to a patient. Putting it through the client's own physician before publication keeps clinical accuracy correct, keeps the byline credible, and keeps liability where it belongs (on the clinic, not on a third-party agency or an AI tool). The physician owns what gets said in their name.
Why does Authoritize run content through an FDA and FTC scanner?
The FTC issues dozens of warning actions against health marketers per year, and the FDA actively monitors testosterone therapy, peptide therapy, GLP-1, and other medical-claim categories. Phrases like "clinically proven," "reverses aging," or unsubstantiated efficacy claims are the most common triggers. Authoritize checks every claim against the FDA warning letter database and the FTC substantiation standard before a word goes live. The check happens before the physician reviews, so the clinic never has to play compliance gatekeeper themselves. A single warning letter can cost a clinic $50K to $500K to defend regardless of outcome. The scanner exists to keep that liability from ever being created.
What does cryptographically signed mean, and why does it matter?
Every published article carries a cryptographic hash bound to the version, the publish date, the physician reviewer, and the citations used. The hash is immutable: it cannot be edited, backdated, or deleted without leaving evidence. This produces an audit trail that proves what was published, by which physician, on what date, with which sources, in a way that an FTC investigator or a plaintiff's attorney can verify independently. If a regulator ever asks a client to substantiate a claim, the audit trail produces it on demand. If a patient cites an article in a complaint, the version they read is preserved exactly as published. No "we'll have to check our records" delay, no convenient revisions disappearing, no plausible deniability either way. The cryptographic signature is the receipts.